| More
Home / Soft Drinks / Headlines


August 25, 2003
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


The Robert Wood Johnson Soda Ban

Even before the famously anti-alcohol Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) officially declared obesity one of its priority concerns, the $8 billion health cop had awarded a grant of $722,925 to anti-soda activist Harold Goldstein.

On Thursday of last week, the California Assembly voted to eliminate the sale of soda in elementary schools, and restrict it in middle schools. The Associated Press reported:

If passed by the Senate and signed by Gov. Gray Davis, the bill would make California the first state to adopt a soda ban, said Harold Goldstein, executive director of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, a nonprofit organization that supports the bill. "It's a watershed event."

But as we reported last week, Texas has already banned soda in elementary schools. Nearly 50 major newspapers picked up the story with Goldstein's gaffe.

The California bill was sponsored by reliable soda-phobe Deborah Ortiz (D-CSPI), who originally wanted a total ban in high schools as well. But Democratic Assemblyman Dario Frommer noted: "Some members feel if you're old enough to go to war and vote you're old enough to have a Pepsi on campus."

At last year's annual conference of the American Public Health Association (APHA), Goldstein -- who has served as APHA's "Action Board Chair" -- revealed his motives during a session called "Challenging the Fast Food Culture." An aide to Senator Ortiz discussed how she and Goldstein "put on our public-health thinking caps" and decided to seek "sin" taxes on soda (click here for video). Goldstein himself argued:

People will say that this obesity epidemic is only a matter of personal responsibility. We in public health know differently. (click here for video).
Crucially, Goldstein also discussed how a grant from RWJF was helping him "to build a movement nationwide with all of you, so we can change this fast-food culture" (click here for video).

Goldstein's group used their RWJF money to build a database of childhood weight and weight-related health problems -- helpfully broken down by California Assembly and Senate district. At a June 16 Institute of Medicine workshop, Goldstein explained the power of this database. He approaches lawmakers whose constituents have more overweight children than the norm, and encourages them to sponsor legislation that targets specific foods and beverages.

"We went to [CA State Senator] Martha Escutia," Goldstein told the audience, "and showed her that more people were dying in her district from diabetes than anywhere else in LA County. And out of that one meeting came SB19" -- an earlier attempt by California health activists to exert greater control over school children's diets. (Goldstein's group asserts that it was the "sponsor" of SB 19.) He closed by saying: "We need to remember that sodas and schools are just entry points to address the bigger issues [including] the millions and millions of dollars spent on advertising."

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Critics Sound Off Against Soda Taxes
    Posted On: Monday 3/8/2010
  • Food Cops Prepare for Round 2
    Posted On: Wednesday 3/3/2010
  • The Golden State Soda Tax
    Posted On: Friday 2/19/2010
  • A Stimulus for Food Cops' Appetites
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/17/2010
  • CSPI: Kings of Gripe
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/9/2010
  • Stossel Gives Us a Break
    Posted On: Monday 1/25/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    Obesity activists a public health threat
    Did you know your soda is a public health menace? read more here »

    NO. Wrong to use tax code to punish soft drink makers and industries.
    Despite opposition from two-thirds of Americans, President Obama has latched onto exploring one proposal to raise billions of dollars for health care reform through so-called “lifestyle taxes” on soft drinks. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.