| More
Home / Trial Lawyers / Headlines


March 2, 2004
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Trial Lawyers Ready To Pounce?

The March issue of the Harvard Business Review includes a fictional case study about a cookie company that has been sued for causing obesity. Four experts were asked to comment, including the Center for Consumer Freedom, and a trial lawyer who has won major verdicts for plaintiffs in tobacco and asbestos cases. He is perhaps the most prominent personal injury lawyer to endorse obesity lawsuits, and his reasoning, while tortured, tells us a great deal about what lies ahead.

"Because the risks posed by [the cookie company's] traditional products outweigh their commercial utility," the trial lawyer suggests, "they provide a basis for a defective-product-design case." Unfortunately, in the twilight zone of the courtroom, this kind of "argument" has resulted in major payouts for trial lawyers.

Of course, it's not like the cookies were actually "defective." The worst that can be said of them is that they (like thousands of products we enjoy daily) contain partially hydrogenated oils. Consumers take note: trial lawyers are now judging the "utility" [read: taste] of a food product. If the "risk" outweighs the "utility," well, you can say goodbye to your favorite foods.

It seems that trial lawyers have adopted the position of Kelly "Big Brother" Brownell, who argues that food companies "cannot be let off the hook for all the unhealthy products they're still promoting." But it turns out that marketing healthy products might result in lawsuits as well. As we note in the Harvard Business Review:

Some lawyers have even contemplated suing companies for marketing low-fat products. They reason that the public is somehow tricked into thinking that "low-fat" is a license to eat more.

Think that's crazy? John "Sue the Bastards" Banzhaf promoted lawsuits against Weight Watchers. He argued the company shouldn't be allowed to charge customers for nutrition information that common sense dictates we already understand. "Everybody knows that if you want to lose weight, you eat less with less calorie input and more exercise," he stated. The bottom line, we wrote in the Harvard Business Review, is that "as long as there are trial lawyers and fat people, no large company whose products contain dietary calories will be immune from obesity related lawsuits."

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Addicted to Blame
    Posted On: Friday 1/8/2010
  • Merry Christmas from CCF!
    Posted On: Thursday 12/24/2009
  • Christmas Cookie Liability: The Santa Claus Clause
    Posted On: Wednesday 12/16/2009
  • Toss Out the Myths With the Embalming Fluid
    Posted On: Wednesday 11/18/2009
  • Lawyer Math: 1 + 1 = Prop. 65
    Posted On: Monday 11/2/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Friday 8/14/2009
  • Dismissed by a Court of Law
    Posted On: Monday 8/10/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 8/4/2009


  • Activist Cash

    John Banzhaf
    Background | Quotes
    Banzhaf has never met a lawsuit he didn’t like. For Banzhaf and his trial-lawyer allies, “big food” is the next tobacco-style cash cow. read more here »

    OpEds

    Turkey, stuffing, and liability wavier?
    This Thanksgiving protect yourself with a "Thanksgiving Liability Indemnification Agreement" read more here »

    'Obesity' lawyers licking chops
    In search of their next supersized payday, lawyers know they can't sue to make people exercise more, so they're targeting food makers. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.