Home / Food Scares / Headlines


September 28, 2006
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Trans Fat: Fact And Fiction

As we told you yesterday, the fight between advocates of consumer freedom and the nanny state's henchmen is coming to a head in New York City, as local lawmakers have unanimously voiced their support for an outright ban on a popular culinary bogeyman: trans fat. Knowing full well that the modus operandi of these food scolds is to hyperbolize their way into the spotlight, we've created a helpful online tool -- www.Trans-FatFacts.com -- to give you the reality, not rhetoric, about trans fats.

Unsurprisingly, the truth about trans fat turns out be significantly more complicated and less scary than the folks at the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) and the Big Apple's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene suggest. Here are just a few of the facts that activists, trial lawyers, and overzealous legislators haven't told you:

We hope Trans-FatFacts.com will dispel the notion that a trans fat phase-out would be as easy as pie. On last night's CBS Evening News, which featured clips from two of our ads, medical correspondent Dr. Jon Lapook echoed the sentiments of most trans-fat-ban advocates: "People have to realize they won't miss it. [The trans fat substitute] tastes exactly the same."

This is partially true. Many companies have voluntarily eliminated trans fats from their products without any noticeable gustatory change. But partially hydrogenated oil -- our primary source of trans fat -- has many characteristics that are hard to replicate without using oils that are high in saturated fats (like butter or lard). Partially hydrogenated oil gives pies their characteristic flaky crust and makes margarine easier to spread. It also keeps cookies soft and gives French fries their distinctive crunch and taste. So unless you're willing to make these foods significantly less tasty or significantly more caloric, legislating trans fats away isn't a very appetizing idea.

Want some more servings of truth? Check out: Trans-FatFacts.com.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • A Not-So-Sweet Marketing Gimmick
    Posted On: Friday 11/20/2009
  • A Godzilla of Corny Hype
    Posted On: Thursday 11/19/2009
  • Just “Say No” to Bogus Health Tips
    Posted On: Monday 11/16/2009
  • OJ with Breakfast? Repent!
    Posted On: Monday 11/9/2009
  • Crushing Beverage Tax Proposals
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/27/2009
  • Cracking the Shell of Animal Rights Activism
    Posted On: Monday 10/26/2009
  • Quote of the Week
    Posted On: Tuesday 10/20/2009
  • More Syrupy Pseudo-Science
    Posted On: Monday 10/19/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Environmental Working Group
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Environmental Working Group is the cauldron where some of the worst science and most creative smear campaigns are cooked up. A web of vested interests including both organic marketers and their public relations operatives reap the benefits of these deceptive advocacy campaigns. read more here »

    Environmental Media Services
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    If you’ve ever been advised to steer clear of a food, beverage, or other consumer product based on the claims of a nonprofit organization, you’ve likely been “spun” by Fenton’s multi-million-dollar message machine — and Environmental Media Services (EMS) has probably been the messenger. read more here »

    OpEds

    Leave food choices to eaters
    Sometimes, a public-health movement goes too far. read more here »

    Eating Shown to be Hazardous to Your Health
    It turns out that in order to be in any real danger from acrylamide, a person of average weight would have to eat over 62 pounds of chips or 182 pounds of fries, every day, for his or her entire life. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2009 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.