| More
Home / Food Police / Headlines


September 17, 2009
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Food Cops Issue Arrest Warrant for Soda

Food Cops Issue Arrest Warrant for Soda

Last week, we reported that President Obama had endorsed the idea of “exploring” a federal tax on soda. Yesterday, the authors of a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) happily obliged Obama’s point of view, calling for a national penny-per-ounce tax on soda. The lineup is all the usual suspects: Kelly “Twinkie Tax” Brownell, NYC health chief Thomas Farley (a noted Thomas Frieden disciple), food ninny David Ludwig, Barry “Wrong on HFCS” Popkin, and other “public health experts” (read: dietary killjoys).

This new report is full of typical drumbeats (read: drivel) from the tax-happy crowd that thinks government should help make our choices about what to eat and drink. The authors tout a national soda tax to reduce obesity and raise government revenue.

They may be right about the latter: A soda tax is a surefire way for politicians to run a “get rich quick” scheme. But as we detailed yesterday, a wealth of academic research demonstrates that a soda tax isn’t an effective tool for reducing obesity rates, in part because there’s serious doubt about whether a link exists between soda and obesity.

As we’re telling reporters:

The math presented in the report does not effectively demonstrate how their proposed tax increase would decrease obesity in society. An analysis this year concluded that, to actually make a dent in the obesity rates, Congress would need a 1,200 percent tax on soda. That means a 75 cent can of soda would be taxed $9 -a tax increase worlds apart from the penny-per-ounce excise tax suggested by the report.

"The tax code shouldn't be a tool for social engineering." said J. Justin Wilson, Senior Research Analyst at the Center for Consumer Freedom. "Nor should it be an instrument for penalizing individuals who make food choices that some people in government don't like."

Brownell and Frieden wrote a piece for the NEJM in April making arguments that are very similar to those in this new report. But attaching a few more PhDs and MPHs to a new essay isn’t going to change the underlying reality: Soda taxes don’t work.

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Taxing “Junk Food” Is Trashy Policy
    Posted On: Tuesday 3/16/2010
  • Hype Masters Call Out Corn Syrup Falsehoods
    Posted On: Thursday 3/11/2010
  • Food Cops Prepare for Round 2
    Posted On: Wednesday 3/3/2010
  • A Stimulus for Food Cops' Appetites
    Posted On: Wednesday 2/17/2010
  • The White House: Food Police Headquarters?
    Posted On: Friday 2/12/2010
  • Personal Responsibility Still Ahead?
    Posted On: Thursday 2/11/2010
  • CSPI: Kings of Gripe
    Posted On: Tuesday 2/9/2010


  • Activist Cash

    Kelly Brownell
    Background
    Kelly Brownell is a Yale psychologist on a decade-long crusade against what he calls America’s “toxic food environment.” He is best known for having first proposed the infamous “Twinkie tax.” read more here »

    Marion Nestle
    Background
    Marion Nestle is one of the country’s most hysterical anti-food-industry fanatics. She writes: “Sellers of food products do not attract the same kind of attention as purveyors of drugs or tobacco. They should.” read more here »

    OpEds

    ‘Tis not the season to be annoyingly wary
    This time of year, people watching their weight while facing down holiday happy hours and open houses can be particularly susceptible to scaremongering by the fat police. read more here »

    High-sodium food fight
    It doesn't take a Ph.D. in nutrition to know that a pile of pancakes, sausage, bacon and eggs is not a healthy breakfast. Except, apparently, when it comes to the nutritionists at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.