| More
Home / Big Fat Lies / Headlines


January 26, 2001
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


How Many People Really Die From Obesity

Talking about his new book, "Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal," Eric Schlosser recently tossed out the overused claim that "the cost of obesity is 300,000 people a year." (You'll need Realplayer to listen to this clip. Get it here.)

But is it? Or is that number inflated by the influence of the weight-loss industry and anti-choice activists like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI)?

The 300,000 figure comes from an October 1999 study that appeared in The Journal of the American Medical Association. Two of the five authors of that study were Dr. D.B. Allison and JoAnn E. Manson.

Allison, who, in voicing support for an onerous and unnecessary "Twinkie Tax," told the San Diego Union-Tribune in 1994 that it might somehow be a good idea to "have higher taxes on Ho-Hos and lower taxes on bean sprouts," has numerous ties to the weight-loss industry. The study's financial disclosure notes, "Dr. Allison has received grants, honoraria, monetary and product donations, was a consultant to, and had contracts or other commitments with numerous organizations involving weight control products and services."

Manson (a CSPI board of scientific advisers member) has already gotten into trouble once for a conflict of interest on a related matter. In 1996, Manson wrote an article for the New England Journal of Medicine hailing the benefits of the weight loss drug Redux without disclosing she had been a paid consultant to the company which produced the drug. ("Flap over NEJM editorial on weight-loss drug brings heavy news coverage," Medical Marketing & Media, October 1996)

Knowing what we do about the conflict of interest involved here, can we put any trust in Allison and Manson's conclusions?

email us comments




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Daily Headlines

  • Hype Masters Call Out Corn Syrup Falsehoods
    Posted On: Thursday 3/11/2010
  • BMI Surveillance: Another Flabby Idea
    Posted On: Thursday 3/4/2010
  • The Golden State Soda Tax
    Posted On: Friday 2/19/2010
  • The Latest Roundup on Roundness
    Posted On: Tuesday 1/12/2010
  • Addicted to Blame
    Posted On: Friday 1/8/2010
  • Back to Make-Believe with Dr. Oz
    Posted On: Wednesday 1/6/2010
  • Fructose Facts Finally Found?
    Posted On: Friday 12/18/2009
  • Grinching Our Diets
    Posted On: Thursday 12/17/2009


  • Activist Cash

    Center for Science in the Public Interest
    Background | Quotes | Financials
    The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) is the undisputed leader among America’s “food police.” CSPI’s joyless eating club has issued hundreds of high-profile — and highly questionable — reports condemning soft drinks, fat substitutes, irradiated meat, biotech food crops, French fries, and just about anything that tastes good. read more here »

    OpEds

    Eat well, but don't skip your exercise
    Unsuccessful dieters and overzealous policymakers might consider that they might have been focusing on the wrong side of the weight-loss equation. read more here »

    Lack of exercise is the problem
    State-by-state obesity trends make more sense when you look at the other side of the obesity equation — physical activity. Simply put, residents of states with high obesity rates tend to move less. read more here »


    Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.