| More
Home / Press Center / Press Releases


Posted On March 11, 2009
printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list


Consumers Win Major Victory Over Seafood Scaremongers

California Appellate Court Rejects Desperate Attempt To Stigmatize A Health Food

Washington D.C.– Today the First Appellate Court of California upheld the original verdict in a 2006 case which established that the trace levels of mercury in canned tuna are naturally occurring, and too insignificant to require warning labels. A three-judge panel heard oral arguments on January 27, when Deputy Attorney General Sue Fiering argued that the labels should be required under California’s “Proposition 65” law despite scientific evidence that 95 to 100 percent of mercury traces are naturally occurring.

David Martosko, the Director of Research for the Center for Consumer Freedom, reacted to the news with this statement:

“The Appellate Court outcome is another huge victory for consumers in this case. For the second time, judges have rightly decided that giving fish the skull-and-crossbones treatment would cause more harm than good.

“California is so nuts for warning labels that the Attorney General wanted to put it on a health food. Oily fish is full of omega-3 fatty acids, which are something of a super-nutrient. And in study after study, scientists are rediscovering that the health benefits of eating fish far outweigh any hypothetical risks.”

In a report titled “Tuna Meltdown” the Center for Consumer Freedom found that over a quarter-million underprivileged American children were born at risk of having abnormally low IQs since the year 2000 because their low-income mothers were scared to eat fish during their pregnancies. This, says CCF, is partially the result of exaggerated government mercury warnings.

A case summary and other details about today’s consumer victory on People ex rel. v. Tri-Union Seafoods LLC et al. is available on the California Appellate Courts website under case number A116792.

To arrange an interview with Mr. Martosko, or for more information, contact Tim Miller at 202-463-7112. To Read “Tuna Meltdown,” visit www.MercuryFacts.org.

###

The Center for Consumer Freedom is a nonprofit coalition supported by restaurants, food companies, and consumers, working together to promote personal responsibility and protect consumer choices.

For media comment, contact our media department at 202-463-7112 ext. 115




printable version email to a friend join our e-mail list

Ad Campaigns

Latest Study on Fish Latest Study on Fish
According to the latest study: you shouldn't eat fish click to view »

Brain Washed? Brain Washed?
The animal-rights nuts at the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine tried to scare Americans away from fish with a misleading ad in the Washington Post. Our rapid response made sure Post readers knew what the group was really up to… Don't let animal-rights activists brainwash you with fish stories. click to view »


OpEds

Fishy Omega-3 risks
If the FDA's report becomes official policy, the conventional wisdom urging women of childbearing age to eat less fish will be turned completely upside-down. read more here »

Poor Children Suffer From Tuna Fears
Seafood warnings are hurting, not helping, America’s most vulnerable kids. Sad? Yes. Shameful? Absolutely. read more here »

Letters

Mercury’s ill effects overstated
The well-documented health benefits of consuming fish far outweigh any hypothetical health risks. It's time that fish regained its old reputation as "brain food." read more here »

A fish story you shouldn't swallow
Consumers shouldn't be scared away from a diet rich in seafood, despite the scary headlines generated by a recent U.S. Geological Survey report. read more here »

Little to fret over with mercury in Colorado fish
Its frustrating, but not too surprising, that so many people are overreacting to trace levels of mercury found in Colorado sport fish. read more here »


Copyright © 1997-2010 Center for Consumer Freedom. Tel: 202-463-7112.